In the era of Instagram and TikTok, health debates are no longer held in scientific journals or medical conferences, they are fought in comment sections and viral reels. This shift has created a troubling trend: individuals without formal qualifications positioning themselves as authorities in complex health fields, giving sweeping judgements on medical products and nutrition therapies.
Recently, certain social-media personalities have begun accusing wellness brands of “selling simple water” or creating “placebo effects” with products designed for metabolic support, PCOS management, or ketogenic nutrition routines. Such remarks may earn clicks but they risk misleading the public.
What critics fail to recognize is that placebo effect is not a scam, it is a documented scientific phenomenon acknowledged in medical research worldwide. Even in controlled clinical studies, placebo responses are accepted as real contributors to patient improvement. To dismiss something as “just placebo” shows a lack of understanding of basic scientific methodology.
Moreover, oversimplifying specialized formulations as “just water” ignores biochemical processes, hydration science, electrolyte balance, and micronutrient supplementation, areas that trained professionals study for years.
The true mission of many health-focused businesses and clinicians is rooted in wellness, accessibility, and humanity, not hype. When influencers reduce nuanced health solutions to click-bait criticism, they undermine genuine efforts to support people struggling with conditions like PCOS, metabolic disorders, and obesity.
The issue is not questioning products responsible inquiry is essential. The real concern arises when:
-
Claims are made without scientific understanding
-
Products are reviewed without proper research or testing
-
Public trust in science is damaged
-
Followers believe opinions instead of evidence
This environment discourages qualified nutritionists, researchers, and healthcare workers who dedicate years to their education and practice. Their scientific voices are often overshadowed by personalities whose primary qualification is visibility, not verified expertise.
Health information is delicate. It influences real lives. When untrained voices present themselves as gatekeepers of truth, they risk harming the very people they claim to protect.
The public deserves awareness, not alarmism. Curiosity, not cynicism. And evidence, not ego.
Social-media platforms can become powerful tools for education — but only when influence is matched with integrity, humility, and knowledge. A large following does not grant authority. Science does.
Conclusion
We must build a culture where:
-
Qualifications matter
-
Fact-checking is normal
-
Health advice comes from trained professionals
-
Opinions are not mistaken for expertise
Questioning is healthy. Misleading is not.
The goal must always remain human well-being above online popularity.
